Log in

For partners and industry professionals

Partners Academy
Safe Minds, Better Work® is InCheq's maturity-based framework for governing and managing psychosocial health and safety. It is built on academic research, regulatory frameworks, and a structured methodology, and is delivered through three integrated products: Safe Minds Index®, Safe Minds Interventions®, and Safe Minds Risk Management®. The framework evaluates organisational maturity across 10 Pillars aligned to WHS legislation across all Australian jurisdictions and ISO 45003.

The Safe Minds, Better Work® framework

A systems-first approach to psychosocial health and safety.

Mapped to regulatory frameworks and scientific research. Built on academic evidence and data from more than 50 organisations and 50,000 workers. Designed to answer what awareness programmes and survey-only assessments cannot.

The Safe Minds programme
Safe Minds Index ®
Safe Minds Interventions ®
Safe Minds Risk Management ®
Safe Minds, Better Work ®
The programme

Why systems-first

Programmes and surveys identify problems. Systems manage them.

Mental injury claims in Australia rose 161% over the last decade. All other injury types rose 26% in the same period. Time lost is five times longer. Cost: $10.9 billion a year.

Awareness programmes identify the problem. Surveys describe it. Neither manages it. Australian regulators have moved to systems-based requirements: continuous improvement, evidence of trajectory, audit-defensible action. The maturity model meets the obligation.

The evidence base

Built on Psychosocial Safety Climate theory.

Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC) theory positions organisational policies and practices as the upstream cause of worker mental health outcomes. The Safe Minds Index® applies this theory at the system level, integrating multi-source data to measure the system, not its symptoms.

The dataset behind the framework draws on more than 50 organisations and 50,000 workers across multiple sectors and jurisdictions.

Download the full methodology paper (PDF)

The framework

10 Pillars. One score.

Each Pillar is weighted by regulatory importance and mapped to WHS, OHS, and ISO 45003 obligations.

01Leadership Commitment & Governance
02Policy Framework & Organisational Standards
03Hazard Identification & Intelligence
04Risk Assessment & Prioritisation
05Control Implementation & Work Design
06Worker Consultation & Participation
07Training & Capability Development
08Monitoring, Review & Performance Measurement
09Incident Response & Support Systems
10Documentation & Knowledge Management

A 0–100 composite score combining Pillar maturity assessment with risk indicator data from claims, absence, engagement, reporting, and workforce stability.

The maturity model

Five levels. A trajectory, not a snapshot.

Each level signals what is in place, what is missing, and what comes next.

Level 1 Basic

No formal systems. Response is ad hoc and incident-triggered.

Regulatory exposure on critical Pillars; limited defensibility

Level 2 Developing

Some activity but inconsistent. Awareness exists but implementation is uneven.

Partial compliance; gaps are documentable

Level 3 Defined

Formal processes established. Implementation more consistent but not yet organisation-wide.

Demonstrable progress; defensible if trajectory is clear

Level 4 Systematic

Comprehensive, evidence-based. Processes operational across the organisation and monitored.

Defensible, auditable regulatory position

Level 5 Optimising

Integrated and continuously improving. Predictive analytics inform strategy.

Sector leadership; leading indicators actively managed

Compliance is the floor. Sector leadership is the ceiling. Over a typical three-year programme, organisations progress from Level 1 or 2 to Level 4.

The principles

Four principles distinguish a maturity programme from a compliance exercise.

Diagnosis Before Design

A needs assessment precedes intervention design. Programmes built on diagnosis perform measurably better than off-the-shelf approaches.

Existing Data First

Triangulation across HR, safety, claims, and operational systems. Higher fidelity than surveys. Repeatable measurement without disruption to business-as-usual.

Intelligent Systems

The system sharpens with each cycle. At maturity, the Safe Minds Index® functions as an actuarial-grade early warning.

Maturity as Continuous Capability

Compliance is the floor of the model. Continuous improvement is the trajectory. Sector leadership is the ceiling.

Regulatory alignment

Mapped to every Australian jurisdiction.

Each Pillar maps to specific clauses across Australian WHS and OHS legislation, the Model WHS Act, Model Codes of Practice, and ISO 45003:2021.

See the full regulatory landscape

The system

Three products. One integrated system.

What the system delivers

Analytics on the organisation's specific data. Each recommendation carries a confidence and impact rating. Compliance and risk first, optimisation second.

Reporting at every level

Boards see governance. Management see oversight. Line supervisors see their teams and the controls they own.

Adoption support

Capability builds adoption.

Self-serve systems do not get adopted. Capability is built alongside the framework, not after it.

The InCheq Academy

Training and accreditation for safety, HR, and operational professionals working with the framework. Methodology, the 10 Pillars, regulatory alignment, and intervention design.

Explore the Academy

The accredited partner network

Consultants and firms accredited to deliver the framework end to end. Onboarding, audit support, training, transformation strategy, and HR and safety function support.

See the partner ecosystem

For most organisations, the partner network is the default delivery pathway. Same framework, expert hand-holding.

Governance and audit

Defensible by design.

Standardised third-party assessment

Same methodology across every organisation and industry.

Risk-to-action traceability

Every recommendation tied to a diagnosed gap. Every action logged.

Documented due diligence

Evidence of decisions, advice sought, and rationale. Officer due diligence supported.

Board-ready reporting

Familiar metrics. Consistent format. Ready to act on.

Inspection precedent

A WorkSafe improvement notice was withdrawn after the client presented their Safe Minds Index®, documented actions, and three-year roadmap. Full compliance was not yet in place. What satisfied the regulator was the systems-based approach and a credible psychosocial safety roadmap.

The first step

Begin with measurement.

A 30-minute briefing. We will show you what your data could surface and how the Safe Minds Index® would map to your jurisdictions.

30 minutes · No prep · Written brief either way