Industries
The Safe Minds Index® applies consistently across all sectors. Industry context shapes how results are benchmarked, prioritised, and acted on — without fragmenting the framework or creating parallel methodologies.
Insurance & Financial Services
High-pressure, client-facing, and heavily regulated. Financial services organisations face WHS obligations and increasing APRA governance expectations around non-financial risk — including people and culture.
Clients include: Allianz, Bupa, WorkCover Queensland, La Trobe Financial
Explore this sector →
Transport & Infrastructure
Shift work, public contact, and safety-critical roles create complex psychosocial risk profiles. Victoria's OHS Regulations 2025 are already in force. NSW obligations follow in July 2026.
Clients include: Yarra Trams
Explore this sector →
Government & Public Sector
Public sector organisations carry the same WHS obligations as the private sector, with officer due diligence duties that now explicitly cover psychosocial hazard management.
Clients include: WorkCover Queensland, Hepburn Shire Council
Explore this sector →
Construction & High-Risk Operations
Strong physical safety culture, but psychosocial risk is underreported and under-managed. The same regulatory rigour now applies to psychosocial hazards as to physical ones.
Clients include: Downer Group
Explore this sector →
Manufacturing & Industrial Operations
Shift-based workforces, production pressure, and multi-site complexity create significant psychosocial exposure that standard surveys systematically underdetect.
Clients include: Campari
Explore this sector →
Community Services & Not-for-Profit
Some of the highest psychosocial risk exposure of any sector. WHS obligations apply in full — and inadequate management directly undermines service quality and client safety.
Clients include: SSI
Explore this sector →
One framework. Applied by context.
The Safe Minds Index® uses a single standardised framework across all industries. There are no industry-specific scoring models, no bespoke methodologies, and no parallel assessment structures.
Industry context informs how results are benchmarked against relevant peers, how recommendations are prioritised given sector-specific regulatory focus, and how the improvement pathway is sequenced given workforce and operational characteristics. The underlying maturity criteria and governance standards are consistent across every engagement.
This ensures defensible consistency: organisations can be confident their maturity is measured against a single, evidence-based standard, while insights remain relevant to their operating environment.
Trusted across industries
Not sure which sector page applies to you?
Many organisations operate across multiple sectors. Start with a conversation and we'll map your specific context to the right approach.
Request a briefing